Proceed to Other Issues and Injuries.

Return to Criminalistics Laboratory Methods.

Firearms Tutorial menu

Examination of Gunshot Residue

Appearances of Gunpowder

All gunpowders are designed to burn quickly to produce rapid expansion of gas in a confined space. In an explosion something gets very big very fast. The burning rate of gunpowder can be classified in three categories:

  • Degressive (regressive) burning: gunpowder grains formed in flakes, balls, and sticks have a burning surface area that decreases continuously as the grains are consumed.

  • Neutral burning: gunpowder grains that are single perforated and the burning surface area remains relatively constant.

  • Progressive burning: gunpowder grains that are multiperforated and rosettes that have a burning surface area that increases continuously as the grains are consumed.

Unburned gunpowders can have recognizable shapes, colors, and sizes of grains. (Pun and Gallusser, 2007)

Composition of Gunshot Residue

Firing a weapon produces combustion of both the primer and powder of the cartridge. The residue of the combustion products, called gunshot residue, can consist of both burned and unburned primer or powder components, and can be used to detect a fired cartridge. Gunshot residue may be found on the skin or clothing of the person who fired the gun, on an entrance wound of a victim, or on other target materials at the scene. The discharge of a firearm, particularly a revolver, can deposit residues even to persons at close proximity, so interpretations as to who fired the weapon should be made with caution. (Dalby et al, 2010)

The major primer elements are lead (Pb), barium (Ba), or antimony (Sb). Usually, all three are present. Less common elements include aluminum (Al), sulfur (S), tin (Sn), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), chlorine (Cl), copper (Cu), strontium (Sr), zinc (Zn), titanium (Ti), or silicon (Si). A mercury-fulminant based primer may be found in ammunition manufactured in Eastern Europe and used in the Middle East.(Zeichner, et al, 1992) Primer elements may be easier to detect in residues because they do not get as hot as the powder. So-called "lead free" ammunition may contain one or more elements including strontium (Sr), zinc (Zn), titanium (Ti), copper (Cu), antimony (Sb), aluminum (Al), or potassium (K). Both titanium and zinc are commonly used in paints and can be contaminants, but the appearance of particles containing them can be distinguished from gunshot residue by SEM. (Martiny et al, 2008) (Dalby et al, 2010)

The cartridge case, bullet, bullet coating, and metal jacket also contain specific elements that can be detected. Virtually all cartridge cases are made of brass (70% copper and 30% zinc). A few have a nickel coating. Primer cases are of similar composition (Cu-Zn). Bullet cores are most often lead and antimony, with a very few having a ferrous alloy core. Bullet jackets are usually brass (90% copper with 10% zinc), but some are a ferrous alloy and some are aluminum. Some bullet coatings may also contain nickel. (Ravreby, 1982).

Modern gunpowder, or "smokeless" powder, can contain up to 23 organic compounds (FBI study). Nitrocellulose is virtually always present, along with other compounds containing nitrate or nitrogen. One of these compounds, diphenylamine (used as a stabilizer in the powder), can be detected using reagents containing sulfuric acid. (Maloney et al, 1982) Modern gunpowders are also described as "single-base" when the basic ingredient is nitrocellulose and as "double-base" when there is additionally 1 to 40% nitroglycerine added. Hardy and Chera (1979) describe a method to differentiate them using a mass spectrometer.

In the physical examination of the scene or body for evidence of gunshot residue, it must be remembered that lead residues may mimic gunshot residue. Lead residues may be found up to 30 feet from the muzzle, and are always present on the opposite side of a penetrated target. Such a situation has been reported when an intermediate target (glass) was present. (Messler and Armstrong, 1978)

The amount and pattern of residue deposited may vary by the gun used to fire the bullet. (Lepik and Vassiljev, 2010) Though the amount of residue deposited tends to decrease with increasing range of fire, the actual deposits can be highly variable for ranges up to 20 cm.(Brown, Cauchi, et al, 1999) GSR has been reported to be found at distances from 6 to 18 meters forward of the shooter, and up to 6 meters laterally. However, climatic conditions significantly influence recovery rates for GSR. (Dalby et al, 2010) Use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) for detection of particle size in relation to range of fire has been described. (Mou, Lakadwar, and Rabalais, 2008)

Detection of Gunshot Residue

The major methods for detection of primer residues are analytical and qualitative. Analytical methods include neutron activation analysis (NAA) as well as atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive analysis by x-ray detector (SEM-EDX) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) are used to identify the primer residue qualitatively. An X-ray analyzer can be beamed directly onto the particles visualized with SEM, so that the energy dispersive pattern can be generated, giving the elemental composition of the particles. For these methods, samples must be obtained from the skin surfaces of a victim at the scene. Delay in obtaining residues, movement, or washing of the body prior to autopsy will diminish or destroy gunshot residues. (Molina et al, 2007) A rapid loss in numbers of GSR particles occurs from 1 to 3 hours post firearm discharge, though maximum recovery times of 1 to 48 hours have been reported. (Dalby et al, 2010)

The method of collection for residue is quite simple and easily carried out in the field. The two widely used methods incude collection onto a carbon-coated adhesive stub or with an alcohol swab. Of the two, the stub has fewer false negatives from greater collection efficiency. The swab method may have usefulness when the surface to be tested is smooth, or if propellant analysis is required. The stub can be directly applied to the surface (skin or other material) to be tested. The stub, with the residue on the surface, can be directly prepared for examination in the SEM device. A major advantage of SEM is that it can reveal the actual surface details of the particles examined, for comparison with known examples of gunshot residue, and pictures can be taken. The large particles of partially burned powder and the spheres of residue can be distinguished from contaminant materials. (Reid et al, 2010)

Scanning Electron Micrograph of GSR

Diagram of the SEM-EDX pattern of GSR

Any hand or body part that was close to the fired weapon may have residue appearing consistent with having fired the weapon. Clothing should always be retained on the body up to autopsy, as this may modify entrance wounds, need examination for gunshot residues, or aid in interpretation of the scene. (Dalby et al, 2010)

The type of weapon can influence the distribution of GSR. For handguns, variables include: barrel length and caliber affecting the plume or cone of gases emitted with their GSR particle; nature of the ejection port of pistols; and barrel-drum gap of revolvers. (Ditrich, 2012)

Gunshot residue analysis requires careful evaluation. False positives may be caused by contamination or transfer of GSR to the body by mishandling, or when the body is heavily contaminated by GSR from previous shooting. However, the number of particles from secondary environmental contamination is low. (Berk et al, 2007) False positives from neutron activation analysis or from atomic absorption spectroscopy assays can be avoided with SEM because of the ability to identify the morphology of particles. False negatives result from washing of the hands (when this area is sampled) or by victim wearing gloves. A rifle or shotgun may not deposit GSR on hands, bur more likely in the crook of the support arm. (Dalby et al, 2010)

SEM may also have usefulness for examination of bullets, as embedded materials from the target such as bone fragments may aid in reconstruction of the scene (DiMaio VJ et al, 1987). SEM has been used to study tool marks made by the firing pin impressions in the primers of spent cartridges. Such findings could be useful to determine which gun was used to fire the cartridge. Grove et al (1972) found that SEM could reveal clearly all surface detail in the impression and that 50% of shotgun impressions and 75% of rifle impressions could be positively identified on the basis of four or more individual characteristics, given similar class characteristics.

Another technique for analysis of GSR is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). In a study of wound samples microwave-digested and analyzed using ICP-MS to detect all elements present at measurable levels in GSR, shot versus unshot tissues could be distinguished. Additionally, jacketed and nonjacketed bullet types could also be distinguished. (Udey et al, 2011)

The presence of GSR may vary from entrance to exit wounds, for the entrance wound will usually have more than the exit, or the exit will have none. At close range, macroscopic examination of the entrance wound is in concordance with microscopic appearance of GSR in all cases, but for distant range gross detection of GSR is negative in a third of cases, though microscopically present. A fifth of exit wounds, though lacking grossly detectable GSR, have microscopic evidence of GSR, thus confounding distinction of entrance and exit wounds by microscopy alone. (Perez and Molina, 2012)

Residue is lacking in entrance wounds with airguns (Denton et al, 2006) (Cohle et al, 1987). The alizarin red S stain can be utilized in microscopic tissue sections to determine the presence of barium as part of GSR (Tschirhart, Noguchi, Klatt, 1991).

It may be difficult to both find and determine the nature of gunshot wounds in a decomposed body. Determination of the range may be particularly difficult. Extreme care should be taken to avoid misinterpretation of the wounds and artefacts.

Other Examinations

Cases have been described in which suicide victims' hands were stained orange-brown from contact with gun barrels following death, presumably from perspiration coupled with a prolonged post-mortem interval of contact. (Norton et al, 1979)

Latent fingerprints may be detectable on cartridges and expended shell casings. Such fingerprints, called latent because they are transferred via a substance on the skin ridges to an object. On a gun, such substances could include cleaning solvents or gun oils. Usually, the substances consist of perspiration mixed with oils from sebaceous glands. Conditions of increased temperature and low humidity decrease the persistence of fingerprints. Brass retains the fingerprints better than nickel-plated materials. (Given, 1976)

Each firearm sold (other than black powder weapons) has a manufacturer's serial number stamped into it which may be used to identify the weapon. Registration of firearms provides a way of tracing gun ownership. However, attempts may be made to obliterate registration numbers by grinding or filing the metal. (Polk and Giessen, 1975)

Gas chromatography has been used to identify gun oils in targets, and was very sensitive, even with stored specimens (Kijewski and Jakel, 1986).

The DNA from cells of assailants can be identified on a firearm or clothing or other objects left at the scene. The cells may be present in blood or body fluids or from epithelium (skin) and left behind on objects recovered upon scene investigation. Sampling for recovery of these biological materials may involve: cutting a portion of material, swabbing a surface, and applying adhesive tape to a surface. Adhesive tape has the advantage of selective sampling to recover epithelial cells while reducing contamination of PCR inhibitors such as dyes in clothing. The technique commonly employed to detect DNA is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which detects minute amounts of DNA. (Barash et al, 2010)

So-called "backspatter" describes the deposition of blood from the victim onto the shooter at close range. The pattern of backspatter has been utilized to determine who fired the weapon. Spatter marks may provide clues to the sequence of events, point of origin, and direction. (Yen et al, 2003)

In a study using high-speed digital video imaging to visualize blood droplets, firearm muzzle gases, and ballistic shock waves with standard reflected light and shadowgraphy imaging techniques, a significant interaction between air currents, muzzle gases, and particulate material emanating from the firearms upon discharge with backspattered blood was observed. Blood droplets that initially spattered back toward the firearm and the shooter were observed to change direction under the influence of firearm-induced air currents and were blown forward toward and beyond their original source location. Hence, patterns of backspatter are complex and affected by multiple variables. (Taylor et al, 2011)


Proceed to Other Issues and Injuries.

Return to Criminalistics Laboratory Methods.

Firearms Tutorial menu