|
1
|
- Boyd Richards, PhD
- Baylor College of Medicine
|
|
2
|
- Dr. Larry Michaelsen
- Professor of Management and Carnegie Foundation Pew Scholar
- Baylor Colleagues
- Paul Haidet, MD, MPH, Charles Seidel, PhD
- Nancy Searle, EdD, Adam Kelly, PhD
- Virginia Schneider, PA
- Partners at 10+ Medical Schools
- Linda Perkowski, Chair, National Advisory Panel
|
|
3
|
- Team Learning Defined
- Hands-on Experience
- Applications and Outcomes
- Conclusion
|
|
4
|
- At the end of this presentation you will:
- want to learn more about Team Learning
- consider how you might use Team Learning in your teaching
|
|
5
|
- A 24-year-old medical student
presents with a complaint of feeling overwhelmed in preparation for an
exam in three days, and somewhat isolated from peers (all of whom study
individually). He finds lectures boring and endless, and small groups
not helpful except when the “answers” are given right away.
|
|
6
|
- A 46-year-old associate
professor presents with complaint
of exasperation in teaching because the students, though bright
enough, tend to come ill-prepared
and resistant to being challenged.
|
|
7
|
- A 51-year-old course director
complains of fatigue from having to beg faculty to lead small groups.
She feels hopeless about getting these
faculty volunteers to all work from “the same page” and is discouraged when students
gravitate to groups led by a few popular faculty.
|
|
8
|
- A 53-year-old associate dean
presents with complaint of too many complaints from preclinical faculty
about students not attending lecture or small groups and not
participating. He also has complaints from clerkship directors that students take too long to learn
how to work within teams.
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Sample Group Application (1 of 2-3)
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- What:
- Divide into groups
- Work in groups to solve task
- Share answers simultaneously
- Discuss and defend answers
- Context:
- Teacher Education Course in English
- Unit on instructional methods
- Illustrating concepts using content area of
Active Versus Passive Voice
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Students list mistakes that writers frequently make that detract from
their efforts to write in active voice.
- Students read a given passage and identify an example of a) active
voice, and b) passive voice.
- Students read a passage and identify the sentence where passive voice is
used most appropriately.
- Instructor gives a lecture on how to determine effective use of active
vs passive voice in writing.
|
|
20
|
- Intra-group versus inter-group discussion.
- Quantity and quality of engagement.
- Role of task design and facilitation.
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Medical School (UME)
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Introduction to Clinical Medicine
- Physiology
- Allied Health
- Physical Diagnosis
- Physiology
- Faculty Development Workshops
- Medical School (GME)
|
|
23
|
- Albany Evidence-based medicine
- Arizona Anatomy; Microbiology; Histology
- Oklahoma Physiology;
Neuroscience; Anatomy
- Rochester Neuroscience
- Southwestern Allied Health; Ethics; Microbiology
- Texas Tech Pharmacology
- UNC Cardiovascular; Urology Clerkship
- UT-Houston Biochemistry; Anatomy
- UTMB Allied Health; Psychiatry Clerkship
- Wright State Throughout preclinical (25% of grade)
|
|
24
|
- Engagement
- Knowledge
- Skill
- Attitude
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- “I’m convinced that Team Learning …. helps the learner go from a passive
‘student’ role to a more involved ‘learner’ role.”
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- “The overall level of learning, as assessed by the course director of
the last decade, is higher than in previous years--even the years when
we used PBL in this course.”
|
|
29
|
- “90% of the 184 responding students felt that the team learning
exercises were worthwhile and helped them learn physiology.”
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- “The class average grade on the final examination was 86.0 (sd=7.38).
The vast majority of students demonstrated mastery of all
[skills-oriented] objectives of the course as assessed by this
examination”
|
|
35
|
- “[Students] feel they are engaging in exercises that accurately mimic
their future work on clinical rotations. That is a tremendous morale
boost for students. It has helped them see the relevance of classroom
learning.”
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- “It does help to have all these different team experiences so when you
go out looking for a job yourself, you are already pretty comfortable
with the idea of working in teams.”
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- “I just felt like you wanted to be a team player, so you wanted to be
there to help your team out when they were answering the questions and
give your input. And you wanted to try to read the night before to help
your team”
|
|
40
|
- “In the standard classroom
format, if you don’t study or you fall asleep in class, you don’t learn
anything; whereas in this one, because you go over it in a group, you
are kind of forced to talk it over and learn something”
|
|
41
|
- “...a lot of times students were kind of learning the stuff, you know,
from scratch and because of their levels of understanding are able to
explain it to other students in a way that students can understand
because they are kind of at the same level...”
|
|
42
|
- medical student who feels isolated; behind in learning
- lecturer frustrated that students not prepared for class
- course director who can’t get faculty for small groups; inconsistent
teaching
- associate dean getting complaints that student didn’t know how to work
in teams
|
|
43
|
- A. preclinical lecture
- B. clerkship lecture
- C. noon-time lecture
- D. morning report
- E. grand rounds
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD Team-Based Learning: A Transformative
use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Stylus Publishing, LLC
Sterling, VA, 2004.
I'd invite any individuals interested to be included in our team
learning collaborative (includes a list serve) to send their name and
email to Shena Pearson (spearson@bcm.tmc.edu).
|