Protocol Registry of Evidence Reviews at the University of Utah

Overview

Our protocol registry lists and links to the a priori methodology plan for evidence reviews, such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews or rapid reviews conducted by teams at the University of Utah. Protocols should meet PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Publication of a protocol for a review that is written without knowledge of the available studies reduces the impact of review authors’ biases, promotes transparency of methods and processes, reduces the potential for duplication, allows peer review of the planned methods before they have been completed, and offers an opportunity for the review team to plan resources and logistics for undertaking the review itself.

Lasserson TJ, Thomas J, Higgins JPT. Chapter 1: Starting a review. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

 

 

 

 

Organizations

Marriott Library logoCochrane logo

Campbell Collaboration logo EPPI Centre logo Equator Network logo

JBI logo AHRQ logo SRDR logoPRISMA logo

Search Collection

Search Protocol Registry of Evidence Reviews:

Catalog


(3 query results found)
[#] Thumbnail Image Title Date Setname Type
1 Shared Decision Making Tools Implemented in the EHR: A Scoping Review Protocol [not set] Protocol Registry of Evidence Reviews at the University of Utah [not set]
2 Utilization of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Surgical Care: A Scoping Review Protocol [not set] Protocol Registry of Evidence Reviews at the University of Utah [not set]
3 Ventricular myocardial strain in individuals with sickle cell disease: a systematic review protocol [not set] Protocol Registry of Evidence Reviews at the University of Utah [not set]

View these listing results in catalog